Mainly it is a simplicity, technical endurance and total sturdiness. On the other hand, the BVP-2 has also got some positive qualities that are still very appreciated. Very important negative is also a very limited and low room for passengers, which is, considering increase of modern soldier´s equipment, more and more important factor. As a result of that BVP-2 is equipped with quite thin armour, significantly thinner thank modern IFVs, the level of mine protection is also insufficient. The BVP-2 disadvantage is much more a conceptual obsolescence caused by a technical level of its creation but also by its use philosophy for planned deployment during the Cold war. For instance, M-113 American armoured transporter keeps serving in number of tens of thousands of pieces. After all, there are deployed even older armoured vehicles in the world. Maybe it is not about the technical age of these vehicles. Therefore, we shall ask - what will be the future of these combat vehicles? May they still be of any use? IFV /BVP-2/BMP-2 todayīVP-2 is already obsolete to current standards. Nevertheless, many of them are still in quite good technical state. At the moment the CAF operates quite a significant number of these vehicles, approx. However, whatever should the end of this rearmament program be, the result of that will, of course, be removal of so far used infantry fighting vehicles BVP-2 from service. The current process of new infantry fighting vehicle choice is probably the most discussed program of the CAF, or rather of Czech Ministry of Defence.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |